“At these referendums, there are no winners, because people have gained nothing from the results. But many will lose their rights because of the bad government laws. The weakest members of our society will lose the most – the elderly, the disabled, and others who need help from other people, because their long-term care rights …
With more than 90 percent of the ballots having been counted, we can now be certain that all three laws that the voters were deciding on at Sunday’s referendum will be enacted. Support for the amendment to the Radio-Television Slovenia Act and the amendments to the Long-Term Care Act exceeded 60 percent, with 40 percent …
Activist Nika Kovač Called 40 Percent Of Citizens Who Went To The Polls “Evil” Read More »
“The new government, headed by Golob and the Freedom Movement (Gibanje Svoboda) is, in many respects, far worse than the previous, Janša one, in terms of its treatment of the environment and nature (and more), whether you are willing to admit it or not. It has decided to take an even more cruel step against …
Prime Minister Robert Golob presented his decision to harmonise the pensions earlier, in November instead of February, by saying that it was good that pensioners would get some extra money a bit earlier, to bridge the festive period a bit easier. But the fact is that the government should have made the decision weeks ago …
“This could have happened in 2018 already, but it did not!” said Janez Sušnik, President of Slovenian Federation of Pensioners’ Associations (Zveza društev upokojencev Slovenije – ZDUS), in a video published by Slovenian Democratic Party (Slovenska demokratska stranka – SDS). His statement refers to E-care, which the current government of Robert Golob wants to abolish, …
Slovenian Democratic Party (Slovenska demokratska stranka – SDS) has submitted signatures for the three referendum initiatives, namely, for the referendum on the government, for the referendum on the public media outlet Radio-Television Slovenia, and for the referendum on long-term care. “The collected signatures allow voters to vote in a referendum on the rejection of the …
The SDS Party Has Submitted The Signatures: “At The Referendums, Choose No Three Times” Read More »
On Tuesday, Aleš Primc, one of Slovenia’s best-known civil society activists, said that they have managed to collect more than 30,000 signatures for a referendum for the protection of children and families. In just five days, they have thus achieved their first goal. “This is 12 times more signatures than the number required by law. …
SDS President Janez Janša announced on Twitter the number of all collected signatures for the call for a triple referendum (long-term care, bureaucracy, and RTV). “We collected 157,138 properly authenticated signatures at the administrative units,” wrote Janša. Against the abolition of long-term care: 52,182 Against the proliferation of bureaucracy: 52,280 Against the politicisation of RTV Slovenia: …
The Slovenian Democratic Party (Slovenska demokratska stranka – SDS) parliamentary group has requested that an extraordinary session of the National Assembly be convened to consider a draft recommendation to the Government of the Republic of Slovenia on the establishment of conditions for the legality of elections, the uniform application of legislation relating to electoral and …
Wherever the wind blows, Janja Sluga sails. After abandoning her fellow MPs during her previous mandate, she declared the referendum a fundamental tool of democracy. Today, apparently, she feels completely different. How else can we explain her silence when the official position of her new party is that the referendums proposed by the SDS are …
After the government decided at a meeting of the government’s Committee on the Economy that it does not oppose the Levica (the Left) party’s idea to call a consultative referendum on changes to the Personal Income Tax Act, the Left changed its mind. Namely, the far-left party does not believe that it would be right …
The Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning regrets that the signatories of the referendum, who wanted to protect drinking water, were misled. The fact is that activities in connection with the Water Act, the purpose of which is water protection and flood safety, have become politicised and that, unfortunately, this is no longer a …
